Giants Executive Worried About Team’s “Identity” Despite $40 Million QB on Roster

After not being franchise-tagged for the second time, Saquon Barkley lastly departed the New York Giants by way of free company to affix the Philadelphia Eagles this offseason. Whereas it was sure that the RB’s absence would go away a void, Giants govt Tim McDonnell’s revelation that Saquon’s departure would have an effect on the group’s identification has amused many.

Commercial

Within the newest episode of this season’s “Arduous Knocks,” one notable highlight noticed Giants proprietor Jim Mara, basic supervisor Joe Schoen, and govt Tim McDonnell discussing the aftermath of Barkley’s exit.

Within the episode, Tim is brazenly seen admitting that in the event that they lose Saquon, their identification would require an entire rebuild, as he was the cornerstone of the Giants’ offense. “We lose Saquon, what’s our identification gonna be?” requested Giants govt Tim McDonnell to others.

In response, GM Joe Schoen reiterated that the main target must be on investing within the offensive line throughout free company and totally backing QB Daniel Jones. “We’ve gotta improve the offensive line, and also you’re paying Daniel Jones $40M. It’s to not hand the ball off to a $12M again,” argued Schoen. 

It’s attention-grabbing to see that the Giants’ administration stays bullish on Daniel Jones regardless of the QB not having lived as much as his potential but. As an illustration, in his five-year NFL profession, Jones has turned the ball over more than scoring touchdowns.

Stats like these for a beginning QB are dismal, however as Schoen argued within the last a part of the episode, even when the Giants had Patrick Mahomes on the helm, he wouldn’t have gained something with their protection.

“Your offseason, the 4 guys, the core guys that had been going to play collectively performed lower than 60 snaps collectively. Miami, we acquired fu*ked, three follow squad guys taking part in for us. Like, no one might… you can have Pat Mahomes, and he can’t fu*king win behind that. I’m not giving up on him [Daniel Jones.”

While it’s encouraging to see the Giants express full faith in a struggling Daniel Jones, after the episode aired, fans expressed that the management should have shown the same faith in Barkley. Among other observations, netizens were also intrigued by GM Schoen’s future planning and unwavering trust in their QB.

“Worst GM in the League”: NFL Fans Rip Apart New York Giants Management

Viewing the clip first evoked many questions in fans’ minds. If Barkley is pivotal to the identity of the team’s offense, then why not retain him? If Jones is a QB who functions well when surrounded by an elite RB, why let Saquon go? Fans were baffled by these questions, therefore, the majority came to the common conclusion that the NY Giants’ management is out of depth in their job. See for yourselves:

One user also highlighted the irony of the Giants worrying about their offensive identity while they have a $40 million QB on the payroll.

Not all was doom and gloom for the Giants’ management on the internet, as one user on “X” argued fairly that retaining Saquon wouldn’t have allowed the Giants to rebuild their team next season if Jones failed again.

While the arguments can go back and forth, the true results will be painted once the 2024 season begins. All eyes will be on the Giants, as their performances will answer two burning questions – 1] Was it proper to again Daniel Jones? 2] Ought to Saquon Barkley have been prolonged?