[ad_1]
Following the conviction of disgraced former BBC Information host Huw Edwards, the British academy can revoke aggressive honors, beginning with these awarded on 2025, in circumstances of “confirmed dishonesty and the very uncommon occasion of a winner being convicted of a severe felony offense leading to a jail sentence.”
Following the conviction of disgraced former BBC Information host Huw Edwards, the British academy can revoke aggressive honors, beginning with these awarded on 2025, in circumstances of “confirmed dishonesty and the very uncommon occasion of a winner being convicted of a severe felony offense leading to a jail sentence.”
BAFTA, the British Academy of Movie and Tv Arts, has added provisions to its rulebook that give it the facility to retrospectively strip winners of its aggressive awards of their trophies in circumstances of convictions of against the law that leads to a jail time period or “confirmed dishonesty,” beginning with winners in 2025.
BAFTA chair Sara Putt on Wednesday unveiled a brand new “forfeiture course of” based mostly on a evaluation, citing the case of former BBC Information host Huw Edwards, who pleaded responsible to 3 counts of constructing indecent photographs of kids this 12 months.
“Earlier this 12 months, we have been shocked by the information of the previous BBC newsreader Huw Edwards’ arrest and subsequent conviction for youngster pornography offenses,” Putt wrote in a letter to BAFTA members. “He gained seven particular person BAFTA Cymru awards for tv presenting between 2002 and 2017. Following the information, deeply complicated questions have been raised relating to historic awards gained by people and particularly, whether or not awards gained in competitors ought to ever be eliminated retrospectively.”
Her letter highlighted that “we aren’t the one awards physique to navigate these complicated points.”
The evaluation concluded that “there are distinctive grounds through which an award gained in competitors ought to be reviewed and presumably rescinded, and that we have to present extra readability to entrants on this in our annual awards rulebooks,” Putt defined. “Beginning in 2025, a forfeiture course of can be launched to our awards rulebooks with particular steering on what would lead us to think about revoking a aggressive award. This can embrace entries rendered ineligible by means of confirmed dishonesty, and the very uncommon occasion of a winner being convicted of a severe felony offense leading to a jail sentence.”
The BAFTA chair additionally highlighted: “We’re very clear that our honorary awards, similar to our Fellowships, Particular Awards and Excellent Contribution awards, might be revoked as a result of they’re gifted by the academy – which suggests they don’t seem to be ‘gained’ in competitors.”
BAFTA thought “very rigorously about whether or not we may attempt to apply this standards retrospectively now,” Putt famous, however “agreed it will be inconceivable to do that correctly. So we’ll look ahead and apply this standards to all aggressive awards introduced from 2025 onwards.”
Concluded Putt: “No answer is ideal and there could also be situations the place the outcomes of this evaluation are examined sooner or later, so we’ll evaluation these rules and processes together with our different awards guidelines yearly.”
[ad_2]
Source link
